|
a |
|
b/README.md |
|
|
1 |
# DeepLearning-HeartSegmentation |
|
|
2 |
Heart segmentation in chest CT scans |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
4 |
## Introduction |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
6 |
This project aims to develop and evaluate deep learning models for the accurate segmentation of the heart in medical images, particularly in non-contrast and non-gated computed tomography (CT) scans. The precise delineation of the heart region is crucial for various medical applications. |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
8 |
## Models and Architectures |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
10 |
### U-Net++ |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
12 |
We employed the U-Net++ architecture as a base model for heart segmentation. The model was trained using a Binary Cross-Entropy loss function. After 100 epochs of training, the model achieved an average Dice similarity coefficient of 0.72 and a Jaccard index of 0.67 on the validation set. |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
14 |
### MA-Net |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
16 |
The Multi-scale Attention Net (MA-Net) architecture was implemented to improve heart segmentation. After 100 epochs, this model outperformed U-Net++ with an average Dice coefficient of 0.85 and a Jaccard index of 0.82 on the validation set. Further training for 200 epochs reduced oscillations in the training and validation metrics. |
|
|
17 |
<p align='center'> |
|
|
18 |
<img src='https://github.com/dcrovo/DeepLearning-HeartSegmentation/blob/main/imgs/MANET_TRAIN.png' /> |
|
|
19 |
<img src='https://github.com/dcrovo/DeepLearning-HeartSegmentation/blob/main/imgs/MANET_DICE_VAL.png' /> |
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
21 |
</p> |
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
23 |
## Results |
|
|
24 |
This is a sample CT scan segmented by the MANET model in red and by a certified board radiologist in green. |
|
|
25 |
<p align='center'> |
|
|
26 |
<img src='https://github.com/dcrovo/DeepLearning-HeartSegmentation/blob/main/imgs/final.png' width=496 height=515/> |
|
|
27 |
</p> |
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
30 |
In summary, the MA-Net model demonstrated superior performance in heart segmentation compared to U-Net++. It achieved a Dice coefficient of 0.883, which compares favourably with state-of-the-art models. However, both models exhibited some overfitting, likely due to the limited size of the training dataset. |
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
32 |
## Future Work |
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
34 |
To enhance the models further, future work will focus on hyperparameter optimization and increased data augmentation. The well-segmented heart regions will be used as a crucial step for addressing broader medical image analysis challenges. |
|
|
35 |
|